Showing posts with label Click. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Click. Show all posts

Google AdWords Experiments with a Click Count Feature

You are here: Home > PPC
Rob Young by Rob Young, June 20, 2011

Google is never short on AdWords experiments, running numerous format and placement experiments of varying sizes at any given time. One recent experiment includes an extra line in the search ad: "X clicks for this advertiser."

There aren't a lot of solid details; while the experiment was spotted by multiple parties and officially confirmed by a Google spokesperson, the extent of the known data is what you can see on your screen:

google-adwords-clicks-for-this-advertisers

Highlights added. Image courtesy of Vinny O'Hare.

This is just one of a few experiments being tried. Other formats reported include a shorter version that gave only the number of clicks (formatted as "X clicks").

Here are a few of the remaining questions for Google:

Are advertisers volunteering for this program, or are the ads just getting the extra line?Is there a threshold on the minimum number of clicks before this line is displayed?What factors determine if this format will be used?Does it seem to be impacting CTR, for better or worse?How is the number of clicks calculated? Total for the campaign, total for the ad, total for the advertiser over their account history, or something else entirely?

I've contacted Google to see if I can get those answers, or at least some more information, but haven't received word yet. I'll update here once more data becomes available.

Those paying attention to the industry know that Google runs experiments frequently, often running them – without the advertiser being aware – on a very small scale. If the format, placement, or other element seems to be helpful to advertisers or users, the experiment expands and can eventually become the status quo.

Other recent Google experiments have caused far more controversy. A display network format based on CPL (cost per lead) even led to accusations that Google was giving the Obama re-election campaign unfair access to experimental new formats. Google denied those claims, stating that no CPL ad packages had been sold to any political group.

The "X clicks" format is a somewhat less exciting format, but one that's more likely to impact the average advertiser. If the number of clicks ends up giving a positive CTR impact, top-heavy investment, larger campaigns, and long-term advertising will become factors in the success of individual ads.

Save up to $500! Register now for SES San Francisco. In addition to high-level strategy, keynotes, an expo floor with 100+ companies, networking events, and parties, you don't want to miss out on the latest trends and strategies during sessions on SEO, PPC management, social media, keyword research, local advertising, mobile engagement, link building, duplicate content, multiple site issues, online video, site optimization, usability, and more. Early bird rates expire July 22.

Google • AdWords • Advertising • Clickthrough rate • Cost per Lead • Political campaign • Barack Obama • Obama

Incisive Interactive Marketing LLC.

© 2011 All rights reserved. 55 Broad St, 22nd Floor, New York, NY 10004

Incisive Media AOP Digital Publisher of the Year

URL structure

A site's URL structure should be as simple as possible. Consider organizing your content so that URLs are constructed logically and in a manner that is most intelligible to humans (when possible, readable words rather than long ID numbers). For example, if you're searching for information about aviation, a URL like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation will help you decide whether to click that link. A URL like http://www.example.com/index.php?id_sezione=360&sid=3a5ebc944f41daa6f849f730f1, is much less appealing to users.
Consider using punctuation in your URLs. The URL http://www.example.com/green-dress.html is much more useful to us than http://www.example.com/greendress.html. We recommend that you use hyphens (-) instead of underscores (_) in your URLs.
Overly complex URLs, especially those containing multiple parameters, can cause a problems for crawlers by creating unnecessarily high numbers of URLs that point to identical or similar content on your site. As a result, Googlebot may consume much more bandwidth than necessary, or may be unable to completely index all the content on your site.
Common causes of this problem

Unnecessarily high numbers of URLs can be caused by a number of issues. These include:

    * Additive filtering of a set of items Many sites provide different views of the same set of items or search results, often allowing the user to filter this set using defined criteria (for example: show me hotels on the beach). When filters can be combined in a additive manner (for example: hotels on the beach and with a fitness center), the number of URLs (views of data) in the sites explodes. Creating a large number of slightly different lists of hotels is redundant, because Googlebot needs to see only a small number of lists from which it can reach the page for each hotel. For example:
          o Hotel properties at "value rates":

            http://www.example.com/hotel-search-results.jsp?Ne=292&N=461

          o Hotel properties at "value rates" on the beach:

            http://www.example.com/hotel-search-results.jsp?Ne=292&N=461+4294967240

          o Hotel properties at "value rates" on the beach and with a fitness center:

            http://www.example.com/hotel-search-results.jsp?Ne=292&N=461+4294967240+4294967270

    * Dynamic generation of documents. This can result in small changes because of counters, timestamps, or advertisements.
    * Problematic parameters in the URL. Session IDs, for example, can create massive amounts of duplication and a greater number of URLs.
    * Sorting parameters. Some large shopping sites provide multiple ways to sort the same items, resulting in a much greater number of URLs. For example:

      http://www.example.com/results?search_type=search_videos&search_query=tpb&search_sort=relevance
         &search_category=25

    * Irrelevant parameters in the URL, such as referral parameters. For example:

      http://www.example.com/search/noheaders?click=6EE2BF1AF6A3D705D5561B7C3564D9C2&clickPage=
         OPD+Product+Page&cat=79

      http://www.example.com/discuss/showthread.php?referrerid=249406&threadid=535913

      http://www.example.com/products/products.asp?N=200063&Ne=500955&ref=foo%2Cbar&Cn=Accessories.

    * Calendar issues. A dynamically generated calendar might generate links to future and previous dates with no restrictions on start of end dates. For example:

      http://www.example.com/calendar.php?d=13&m=8&y=2011

      http://www.example.com/calendar/cgi?2008&month=jan

    * Broken relative links. Broken relative links can often cause infinite spaces. Frequently, this problem arises because of repeated path elements. For example:

      http://www.example.com/index.shtml/discuss/category/school/061121/html/interview/
        category/health/070223/html/category/business/070302/html/category/community/070413/html/FAQ.htm

Steps to resolve this problem

To avoid potential problems with URL structure, we recommend the following:

    * Consider using a robots.txt file to block Googlebot's access to problematic URLs. Typically, you should consider blocking dynamic URLs, such as URLs that generate search results, or URLs that can create infinite spaces, such as calendars. Using regular expressions in your robots.txt file can allow you to easily block large numbers of URLs.
    * Wherever possible, avoid the use of session IDs in URLs. Consider using cookies instead. Check our Webmaster Guidelines for additional information.
    * Whenever possible, shorten URLs by trimming unnecessary parameters.
    * If your site has an infinite calendar, add a nofollow attribute to links to dynamically created future calendar pages.
    * Check your site for broken relative links.